The Illusion of Stability in Mid-1970s Cold War

By the mid-1970s, the Cold War appeared to have settled into a predictable pattern of managed rivalry. The era of détente—marked by arms control agreements, cultural exchanges, and economic cooperation—had reduced global tensions significantly. Leaders like Leonid Brezhnev and Gerald Ford projected an image of pragmatism, with Brezhnev even earning a reputation among Western journalists as a gregarious, life-loving statesman rather than an ideological hardliner. The superpowers seemed to accept a global duopoly, where the U.S. and USSR restrained regional conflicts and nuclear proliferation while maintaining their spheres of influence.

Yet this stability was fragile. Beneath the surface, ideological fervor, regional revolutions, and domestic political shifts in both nations would soon unravel the delicate balance of détente.

The Critics of Détente: Voices of Dissent

Not everyone embraced the thaw in Cold War tensions. In the Soviet bloc, dissidents like Andrei Sakharov condemned Communist authoritarianism. China, pursuing its own revolutionary path, distrusted Soviet-American cooperation. Meanwhile, in the U.S., a growing neoconservative movement—led by figures like Ronald Reagan—denounced détente as a dangerous compromise with an expansionist USSR.

Reagan’s 1976 primary challenge against Ford crystallized this backlash. He framed détente as weakness, declaring:

> “Under Messrs. Kissinger and Ford, this nation has become number two in military power in a world where it is dangerous—if not fatal—to be second best… I don’t want to live in a world where the Soviet Union is Number One.”

Though Reagan lost the nomination, his rhetoric foreshadowed a resurgent Cold War hawkishness.

Watergate, Vietnam, and the Crisis of American Confidence

The collapse of détente was accelerated by America’s domestic turmoil. The Watergate scandal eroded trust in government, while the 1975 fall of Saigon—marked by chaotic helicopter evacuations—symbolized U.S. strategic defeat. South Vietnam’s president Nguyen Van Thieu bitterly accused America of abandonment, and the war’s end left deep scars on national morale.

Meanwhile, Congress, led by Senator Henry Jackson, tied trade benefits to human rights, infuriating Moscow. The Soviet Union saw this as betrayal, while American conservatives argued détente had emboldened Communist advances.

Revolutions and Superpower Rivalry: Angola, Ethiopia, and the Horn of Africa

The Cold War flared anew in the Global South. In Angola, a civil war between Marxist MPLA and U.S.-backed factions escalated into a proxy conflict. Cuban troops, supported by Soviet arms, secured victory for the MPLA by 1976—a stark demonstration of Moscow’s willingness to project power.

Similarly, Ethiopia’s 1974 revolution brought a Marxist junta to power. When Somalia invaded Ethiopia’s Ogaden region in 1977, the USSR and Cuba intervened decisively, airlifting weapons and deploying troops. To Washington, this signaled Soviet expansionism, fueling fears of an “arc of crisis” across the Third World.

Carter’s Dilemma: Human Rights vs. Realpolitik

Jimmy Carter entered office in 1977 pledging to restore moral clarity to U.S. foreign policy. He championed human rights, criticizing both Soviet dissident crackdowns and right-wing dictatorships. Yet his idealism clashed with Cold War realities.

His national security advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, advocated confronting Soviet influence, while Secretary of State Cyrus Vance urged restraint. The rift widened after the 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, which Carter called “the most serious threat to peace since WWII.” He imposed sanctions, halted SALT II ratification, and boycotted the Moscow Olympics—marking a definitive end to détente.

The Rise of Reagan and the New Cold War

The 1980 election of Ronald Reagan cemented the hardline turn. Rejecting accommodation, Reagan framed the Cold War as a moral struggle, vowing to “make America great again” through military buildup and ideological confrontation. His support for anti-Communist insurgents—from Nicaragua’s Contras to Afghanistan’s mujahedin—intensified superpower clashes.

Meanwhile, the Soviet Union, bogged down in Afghanistan and facing economic stagnation, struggled to sustain its global ambitions. By the mid-1980s, the renewed Cold War would push the USSR toward crisis—and eventual collapse.

Legacy: Why Détente Failed

Détente collapsed because:
1. Divergent Expectations – The USSR saw it as recognition of equality; the U.S. as Soviet acceptance of American-led order.
2. Regional Conflicts – Revolutions in Vietnam, Angola, and Afghanistan pulled superpowers into proxy wars.
3. Domestic Politics – Watergate weakened U.S. leadership, while neoconservatives rebelled against compromise.
4. Ideological Incompatibility – Reagan’s moral absolutism clashed with Brezhnev’s stagnant socialism.

The 1970s proved that Cold War tensions could not be permanently managed—only postponed. The era’s lessons resonate today, as great-power rivalries again test the limits of diplomacy.