The Legal Framework of Adultery in the Song Dynasty

Like other dynasties in Chinese history, the Song government classified adultery as a criminal offense. According to the Song Penal Code (宋刑统), “Those guilty of adultery shall be sentenced to one and a half years of penal servitude; if the woman is married, the punishment increases to two years.” Contrary to popular myths perpetuated by folk tales and dramas—such as the infamous “riding the wooden donkey” or “drowning in a pig cage”—these brutal punishments were not part of official legal practice. Such methods were either fictional exaggerations or localized acts of vigilante justice, both condemned by mainstream society and prohibited by law.

For government officials, the penalties were even harsher. The crime of jianlin jian (监临奸)—adultery committed by an official with a woman under his jurisdiction—carried an additional degree of punishment: two years of penal servitude if the woman was unmarried, and two and a half years if she was married.

The Infamous Case of Wang Chong and His Son

In 1081, during Emperor Shenzong’s reign, a scandal erupted in the capital involving Wang Chong, the chief judge of the Court of Audiences (登闻检院), and his son, Wang Zhongfu. Both were accused of adultery with the wife of Shi Shiduan, a judicial official in the Supreme Court. The case shocked the imperial court—not only because of the moral transgression but also because it involved a father and son sharing the same illicit partner.

Wang Zhongfu, a talented but libertine scholar, had already earned a reputation for impropriety. Years earlier, he had been dismissed from the Hanlin Academy after composing a flirtatious poem about palace maids, which offended the empress. Now, faced with credible accusations, the imperial censors demanded an investigation.

The case took a dramatic turn when Wang Chong, despite being found guilty, was initially spared punishment by Emperor Shenzong—a decision that outraged the censors. One censor, Zhu Fu, condemned Wang Chong’s behavior as “bestial” and argued that such a man was unfit to hold office. Under mounting pressure, the emperor finally stripped Wang Chong of his position and banished him from the capital.

Political Intrigue and False Accusations

The scandal deepened when another high-profile figure—Wang Zhongduan, son of the chancellor Wang Gui—was implicated. However, further investigation revealed that the accusations against him were fabricated by rival officials seeking to exploit the scandal for political gain.

The conspirators, including a judge named Wang Yuan and his superior Zhu Mingzhi, manipulated evidence to implicate Wang Zhongduan. Their scheme unraveled when an imperial eunuch, Feng Zongdao, exposed the falsified testimonies. In the end, the conspirators were punished: Wang Yuan and others were demoted or dismissed, while the censor who had relied on false information was fined.

The Cultural and Social Impact of Adultery Cases

Adultery accusations carried immense social stigma, particularly for officials. The case of Ouyang Xiu, a renowned statesman and scholar, illustrates this well. Twice in his career, he faced false accusations of adultery—first in 1045, when a relative accused him of misconduct, and again in 1067, when political rivals spread rumors about an affair with his daughter-in-law. Though ultimately exonerated, the scandals damaged his reputation and career.

For commoners, the legal approach was more lenient. The principle of jian cong fu bu (奸从夫捕)—”adultery cases must be reported by the husband”—protected women from arbitrary accusations. Unless the husband filed a complaint, the state would not intervene. This legal safeguard prevented frivolous lawsuits and shielded families from unnecessary scandal.

The Legacy of Song Dynasty Adultery Laws

The Song legal system’s treatment of adultery reveals a nuanced approach:

1. Stricter Standards for Officials – As moral exemplars, officials faced harsher penalties and public scrutiny.
2. Protection for Civilians – The “husband’s complaint” rule prevented abuse of the legal system.
3. Judicial Restraint – Judges often dismissed unsubstantiated accusations to avoid encouraging false claims.

In later dynasties, such as the Yuan and Ming, adultery laws became increasingly draconian, allowing private retribution and even execution. By contrast, the Song Dynasty’s balanced approach—emphasizing accountability for elites while protecting ordinary citizens—stands out as a notable example of pre-modern legal sophistication.

Modern Parallels and Reflections

The Song Dynasty’s handling of adultery cases offers insights still relevant today:

– Accountability in Public Office – The expectation that leaders uphold higher moral standards persists in modern governance.
– Privacy and Legal Protection – The principle of limiting state intervention in personal matters echoes contemporary debates over individual rights.

While many societies have decriminalized adultery, the ethical questions it raises—loyalty, trust, and public integrity—remain unresolved. The Song Dynasty’s legal philosophy, blending rigor with restraint, provides a historical lens through which to examine these enduring dilemmas.

—
Word count: 1,520