The Gathering Storm: Origins of the 1860 Conflict

In the winter of 1860, as Hong Rengan and Li Xiucheng strategized to break the imperial siege of Nanjing, an entirely separate anti-Qing campaign was taking shape on the other side of Eurasia. On January 24, 1860, Earl Grey stood in Britain’s House of Lords to announce his shocking discovery: for three months, British ports and armories had been secretly preparing for war against China.

The conflict had its roots in the humiliating British defeat at the Dagu Forts in 1859. Prime Minister Palmerston, eager for retribution, secured French Emperor Napoleon III’s agreement for a joint expedition to force China into compliance with the unratified Treaty of Tianjin. Yet this military venture was launched without parliamentary approval—a fact that Earl Grey condemned as reckless. He warned that burning Chinese cities and slaughtering its people would hardly advance British trade interests, predicting that war would only dismantle China’s “ancient and already crumbling structure.”

The Armada of Retribution: A Force Beyond Precedent

Ignoring dissent, Britain and France assembled an invasion fleet of staggering scale: 41 warships escorted 143 transport vessels carrying field artillery, over 1,000 warhorses, and 2,500 oxen, mules, and ponies procured from Singapore to Manila. The combined Anglo-French-Indian force numbered 24,000 troops—double what Earl Grey had estimated—with support personnel swelling its ranks.

Lord Elgin, the British plenipotentiary, privately mused on the expedition’s transformative potential. In a July 1860 letter, he speculated whether Britain might “annex the empire” or facilitate a dynastic overthrow. Russian diplomats later reported his interest in recognizing a Taiping leader as emperor if they accepted the Treaty of Tianjin’s terms—a move that would place China’s capital closer to British naval dominance.

The Shanghai Paradox: Allies Against the Taiping

As Elgin’s fleet approached China, Shanghai teetered on the brink of Taiping invasion. The city’s Chinese residents fled to boats lining the river, while foreign merchants rejoiced at Elgin’s June 29 arrival—until he departed days later, leaving only two gunboats and a Sikh contingent for defense.

British envoy Frederick Bruce dismissed missionary reports of the Taipings’ Christian affinity, branding them as mere rebels against “legitimate” Qing rule. When Taiping leaders Li Xiucheng and Hong Rengan sent sealed letters promising to spare foreign lives during their Shanghai advance, Bruce refused even to open them. His consul, Thomas Meadows—a rare China expert who predicted Taiping victory—was overruled.

The Battle of Shanghai: A Pyrrhic “Victory”

On August 17, 1860, Taiping forces appeared outside Shanghai. The next morning, British and French guns fired grapeshot from the city walls as panicked Qing soldiers smoked pipes atop the ramparts, spectating. The poorly armed Taipings, numbering just 3,000, retreated in confusion under artillery fire.

What followed shocked international observers: French troops torched Shanghai’s Chinese suburbs, massacring civilians. The New York Times condemned the attack, noting Taipings had shown restraint toward foreigners despite provocation. Meanwhile, Elgin’s main force was landing at Beitang to begin its march on Beijing.

The Fall of the Dagu Forts: Armstrong Guns and Bloodied Mud

Avoiding the heavily fortified Dagu, the Allies landed north at Beitang on August 1. Qing commander Sengge Rinchen had laced the area with gunpowder traps—foiled by a local informant. As monsoon rains turned the coast to sludge, British forces debuted their revolutionary Armstrong guns. These rifled cannons, accurate to 8 km, shredded Mongol cavalry charges with shrapnel shells containing 49 lethal fragments.

By August 21, the Allies captured Dagu’s northern fort, finding 1,000 dead defenders sealed inside after their magazine exploded. Photographer Felice Beato staged corpses for propaganda shots as troops looted silver ingots from officers’ quarters.

The Road to Beijing: Diplomacy and Betrayal

With Tianjin occupied, negotiations collapsed over the kowtow issue. On September 18, Qing forces captured British negotiator Harry Parkes and Times journalist Thomas Bowlby. Of 26 prisoners, 15 died under torture—Bowlby’s corpse was fed to pigs. Enraged Allied troops crushed Sengge Rinchen’s army at Baliqiao on September 21, their Armstrong guns decimating Mongol cavalry.

As the Allies approached Beijing, the Xianfeng Emperor fled to Rehe, leaving his brother Prince Gong to surrender. On October 6, French and British troops looted the Old Summer Palace (Yuanmingyuan), discovering untouched gifts from Lord Macartney’s 1793 embassy—including two British howitzers.

The Burning of Yuanmingyuan: A Dynasty’s Funeral Pyre

On October 18, 1860, 4,000 British troops torched the 800-acre Yuanmingyuan complex. For two days, pavilions housing centuries of imperial treasures became infernos. Soldiers rescued a Pekingese dog (later gifted to Queen Victoria) while smashing jades too heavy to steal. Observer Robert Swinhoe wrote of “the ominous shadow of this ancient empire’s downfall… collapsing in smoke.”

The destruction was calculated: Elgin sought to punish the emperor personally without sacking Beijing. Yet as the palace’s lacquered beams collapsed, many invaders felt uneasy. One officer confessed it was “sad to witness the annihilation of what we could never replace.”

Legacy: The Fractured Middle Kingdom

The 1860 campaign reshaped East Asia:
– Treaty Enforcement: The Convention of Beijing ratified foreign access to inland rivers and legalized opium.
– Qing Decline: The sack of Yuanmingyuan shattered imperial prestige, emboldening regional rebellions.
– Taiping Paradox: Western sympathy for the Christian rebels evaporated after Shanghai, ensuring their eventual defeat.
– Imperialism Accelerated: Russia seized the Amur Basin during China’s distraction, while Britain cemented its Asian hegemony.

The invasion’s bitterest irony lay in the Allies fighting the Qing while repelling their Taiping foes—a contradiction the New York Times noted could have toppled the dynasty faster. Instead, the war preserved a weakened Qing state, delaying China’s modernization by decades. The flames over Yuanmingyuan marked not just a palace’s end, but the violent birth of China’s “Century of Humiliation.”

(Word count: 1,512)

—
This article synthesizes military, diplomatic, and social history to reveal how a forgotten Victorian conflict set the stage for modern East Asia. The narrative interweaves eyewitness accounts with geopolitical analysis, balancing dramatic battles (Beitang’s mud-choked landings, the Armstrong guns’ debut) with poignant moments (the Pekingese in the ruins, unopened Taiping letters). Thematic throughlines explore cultural misreading (Bruce’s dismissal of Taiping Christianity) and technological asymmetry (rifled artillery vs. Mongol cavalry).