A Dynasty in Transition: The Rise of the Jiajing Emperor

In 1521, the Ming Dynasty faced an unprecedented constitutional crisis following the death of the Zhengde Emperor. With no male heir, the throne passed to his 13-year-old cousin Zhu Houcong, later known as the Jiajing Emperor. This succession, however, ignited the Great Rites Controversy (大礼议), a pivotal ideological and political battle that would define the early Jiajing reign.

The conflict centered on whether the new emperor should honor his biological parents as imperial ancestors or accept the ritual adoption into the deceased emperor’s lineage—a demand championed by Grand Secretary Yang Tinghe and the bureaucratic elite. For Yang and his Neo-Confucian faction, this was about preserving dynastic legitimacy through strict adherence to Zhu Xi’s ritual orthodoxy. For the young emperor, it was a deeply personal matter of filial piety.

Wang Yangming’s Unlikely Role in the Controversy

The controversy took an unexpected turn when the Jiajing Emperor sought support from Wang Yangming, the philosopher-general whose School of Mind (心学) offered an alternative to Zhu Xi’s rigid formalism. Unlike Yang Tinghe, Wang argued that moral judgments should arise from innate liangzhi (良知, innate knowing) rather than external rituals. To Wang, the emperor’s desire to honor his biological parents was a natural expression of conscience—a stance that implicitly challenged Yang’s authority.

In June 1521, the emperor issued a summons to Wang, then governing Jiangxi, praising his military achievements and inviting him to the capital. Wang saw this as an opportunity to advance his philosophical and political ideals. Yet his disciples warned of the risks: Yang Tinghe dominated the court, and Wang’s patron, Minister of War Wang Qiong, had already been purged.

The Political Chessboard: Factions and Betrayals

Yang Tinghe moved swiftly to block Wang Yangming’s arrival. Citing “national mourning” protocols, he ordered Wang back to Jiangxi and stripped him of additional titles. This was not merely bureaucratic obstruction—it reflected deeper ideological and personal rivalries. Yang resented Wang’s military successes (achieved without crediting the内阁, or Grand Secretariat) and viewed his heterodox philosophy as a threat to state orthodoxy.

The emperor, furious but outmaneuvered, temporarily conceded. Yet the seeds of Yang’s downfall had been sown. The controversy escalated when the emperor’s mother, insulted by her proposed reception as a “consort” rather than empress dowager, refused to enter Beijing. The Jiajing Emperor theatrically threatened to abdicate, forcing Yang to compromise on ceremonial honors—though not on the core issue of parental titles.

The Philosophical Heart of the Conflict

At its core, the Great Rites Controversy was a clash between two Confucian worldviews:
– Zhu Xi’s Ritualism: Emphasized hierarchical order and prescribed rituals as the foundation of moral and political stability.
– Wang Yangming’s Innatism: Prioritized intuitive moral reasoning, arguing that liangzhi could transcend rigid formalism.

Wang’s disciples captured this tension when they questioned whether preemptively distrusting Yang Tinghe would compromise one’s own moral integrity. Wang’s response—that true virtue required engaging with the world without cynicism—highlighted the practical challenges of his philosophy.

Legacy: A Reversal of Fortunes

By 1524, the emperor’s persistence and the support of officials like Zhang Cong (who argued that biological parenthood was sacrosanct) turned the tide. Yang Tinghe was forced into retirement, and the Jiajing Emperor posthumously elevated his parents to imperial status.

For Wang Yangming, the controversy underscored the limits of idealism in politics. Though he never regained a central role, his philosophy flourished outside the court, influencing later thinkers like Li Zhi and even Japanese Tokugawa reformers. The Jiajing Emperor’s victory, meanwhile, cemented imperial autocracy at the expense of bureaucratic checks—a trend that would haunt the late Ming.

Modern Echoes: Conscience vs. Convention

The Great Rites Controversy remains a poignant case study in the tension between individual conscience and institutional authority. In an era where debates over tradition and personal identity rage globally, Wang Yangming’s question—Shouldn’t one’s deepest moral instincts guide action?—resonates across centuries.

As for the Jiajing Emperor, his triumph came at a cost: decades of bitter factionalism and his own descent into paranoia. Yet his defiance, like Wang’s philosophy, reminds us that even the most rigid systems must eventually confront the human heart.

—
Word count: 1,520