The Dawn of a Materialist Age

In 1856, Berlin’s progressive newspaper National-Zeitung captured the spirit of a Europe undergoing profound transformation. Its editors observed how disillusionment with failed ideals had redirected human energy toward tangible achievements—industrial innovation, economic growth, and technological advancement. This shift from idealism to materialism defined the mid-19th century, as societies embraced measurable progress over abstract philosophies.

The period between 1850 and 1856 saw explosive economic growth across the North Atlantic. Industrial manufacturing, mining, railways, and telegraph networks expanded rapidly, while new financial systems—joint-stock companies, banks, and stock markets—fueled capitalist expansion. Discoveries of gold in California (1848) and Australia (1851) injected vast liquidity into global markets, accelerating what we might now recognize as early globalization. Yet this boom was cyclical: by 1857, a worldwide economic depression emerged, though the underlying momentum of industrialization never truly slowed.

Science and Philosophy Champion Materialism

Scientific and philosophical movements provided intellectual foundations for this materialist turn. In 1855, Ludwig Büchner—brother of revolutionary playwright Georg Büchner—published Force and Matter (Kraft und Stoff), arguing that all phenomena, including consciousness, derived from physical laws. Meanwhile, French philosopher Auguste Comte systematized positivism, asserting that human knowledge progressed through three stages: theological, metaphysical, and finally scientific. His 1851–1854 System of Positive Politics envisioned sociology as a discipline to study observable social laws.

The most seismic scientific contribution came in 1859 with Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species, which reframed life itself as a material process shaped by natural selection. Herbert Spencer soon applied evolutionary theory to society, coining “survival of the fittest” in his System of Synthetic Philosophy (1860). These works collectively undermined religious and idealist worldviews, suggesting that progress arose from measurable, mechanistic forces.

Marx and the Political Economy of Revolution

While scientists redefined nature, Karl Marx redefined history. In his 1859 Introduction to a Critique of Political Economy—a precursor to Das Kapital (1867)—he distilled historical materialism’s core premise: economic conditions (“base”) determined societal superstructures (laws, culture, politics). His famous axiom—”It is not the consciousness of men that determines their existence, but their social existence that determines their consciousness”—challenged Hegelian idealism by centering class struggle as history’s engine.

Marx anticipated capitalism’s self-destruction through crises like the 1857 recession, which Friedrich Engels welcomed as a potential revolutionary spark. Yet capitalism adapted, emerging stronger. Ironically, materialism’s rise benefited liberals and conservatives more than socialists. Thinkers like August Ludwig von Rochau (Realpolitik, 1853) advocated pragmatic governance over ideological purity, influencing figures from Bismarck to Disraeli.

Cultural Contradictions and Enduring Idealism

Despite materialism’s ascendancy, idealism persisted in unexpected ways. Churches retained social influence, and nationalist movements often invoked spiritual or romantic rhetoric. Even as Darwinism spread, religious revivalism countered it—a tension epitomized by the 1860 Oxford evolution debate between Thomas Huxley and Bishop Wilberforce.

Art and literature mirrored these conflicts. Realist novels (Flaubert’s Madame Bovary, 1856) depicted society’s gritty truths, while Pre-Raphaelite painters blended medieval idealism with acute naturalism. This duality revealed a central paradox: the 19th century worshipped progress yet yearned for lost certainties.

Legacy: The World That Materialism Built

The materialist revolution’s legacy is omnipresent. Its tenets underpin modern economics, sociology, and evolutionary biology. The 1850s–60s infrastructure boom—railroads, telegraphs, steamships—laid groundwork for today’s interconnected world. Yet Marx’s unresolved critique still echoes in debates over inequality, while Spencer’s social Darwinism warns against misapplying scientific theories.

Most profoundly, this era redefined “progress” itself as a quantifiable, technologically driven pursuit—a paradigm that dominates 21st-century life. Yet as climate change and AI ethics challenge unchecked materialism, the 19th century’s unresolved tensions between idealism and pragmatism feel newly urgent. In grappling with these questions, we remain heirs to the age when Europe dared to measure the immeasurable.

—
[1] Marx, Introduction to a Critique of Political Economy (1859)
[2] Ibid.
[3] Engels, letter to Marx (1857)
[4] Cf. von Rochau, Realpolitik (1853)