The Gathering Storm: Ming China on the Brink

By 1637, the Ming Dynasty was teetering on collapse. Emperor Chongzhen’s reign (1627-1644) had become a nightmare of peasant uprisings, Manchu incursions, and bureaucratic paralysis. The capture of rebel leader Gao Yingxiang in July 1636 marked not an end, but an escalation. Like hydra heads, new rebellions sprouted across China’s heartland:

– Li Zicheng’s forces rampaged through Shaanxi, Ningxia, and Gansu
– Zhang Xianzhong’s armies and allied bands dominated Henan, Huguang, and Anhui

These mobile peasant armies moved like “storm winds,” leaving provincial officials scrambling. Facing this existential crisis, Chongzhen made a fateful decision—appointing the shrewd but overconfident Yang Sichang as Minister of War.

Yang Sichang’s Grand Strategy

Arriving in Beijing in March 1637, Yang immediately implemented a three-pronged approach:

### The “Ten-Sided Net” Military Deployment

Yang’s infamous strategy divided China into:
– Four Fronts (Zheng): Shaanxi, Henan, Huguang, Fengyang—each with dedicated suppression forces
– Six Flanks (Yu): Yansui, Shanxi, Shandong, Yingtian, Jiangxi, Sichuan—serving as containment zones

On paper, this created an inescapable grid. In reality, the overstretched Ming military lacked the coordination to maintain this “leakproof” net.

### The Financial Quagmire

To fund his war machine, Yang demanded:
– 280,800 taels of silver annually
– 120,000 new troops (including 36,000 cavalry)

The funding mechanism exposed Ming’s fatal weakness:
1. Failed elite taxation: Emperor and nobility refused contributions
2. “Equal Levy” policy: Brutal flat tax on peasants, replacing wealth-based assessments
3. Absurd side schemes: Doorframe taxes, “excess land” seizures

As historian Wen Ruilin noted, these measures “drove millions into rebellion”—precisely the outcome Yang sought to prevent.

The Human Cost

Yang’s policies accelerated societal collapse:
– Henan and Huguang: “Hundreds of li without a green stalk” (cannibalism reported)
– Urban unrest: Beijing’s poor cursed “Chongzhen” as “Heavy Taxes”
– Military brutality: Provincial troops often looted more than they fought

The 1639 tax rolls tell the story—registered households in rebel-hit areas dropped by 40-60%, either dead or joined the revolts.

The Ill-Fated Leadership

Yang’s personnel choices proved disastrous:
– Xiong Wencan: Appointed as Supreme Commander based on bribes and drunken boasts
– Fu Shuxun: Special tax commissioner who prioritized collections over stability

Their corruption undermined Yang’s entire strategy.

The Aftermath: A Strategy Unraveled

By 1641, Yang’s “Three Month Pacification” plan had backfired spectacularly:
– Li Zicheng escaped encirclement, sacking Luoyang in 1641
– Zhang Xianzhong fake-surrendered, then rebuilt his forces
– Tax revolts erupted in Shandong and Jiangnan

The final irony? Yang Sichang committed suicide in 1641—the same year Li Zicheng declared his “Great Shun” dynasty.

Why This Failed Campaign Matters Today

Yang’s debacle offers timeless lessons:
1. Elite intransigence: Ruling classes rarely surrender privileges, even facing collapse
2. Military overreach: Complex strategies fail without grassroots support
3. Taxation traps: Extractive policies fuel the crises they aim to solve

As modern states grapple with inequality and unrest, the Ming’s fatal choices echo through centuries—a warning written in blood and silver.

—
[1] Imperial comment during Yang’s appointment: “I regret employing you so late”
[2] Yang’s memorial On Making Domestic Pacification the Primary Task (April 1637)
[3] Operational details from Ming Shi Lu veritable records
[4] Chongzhen’s lament during court debate on funding
[5] Contrast with Lu Xiangsheng’s wealth-based tax proposal
[6] Yang’s dismissal of progressive taxation
[7] Imperial edict for the “Equal Levy” (May 1637)
[8] Yang’s eyewitness account of central China’s devastation
[9] The infamous “household door tax” decree
[10] Local corruption in tax collection
[11] Beijing street slang recorded in Jue Shi Tong Yan
[12] Yang’s recommendation of Xiong Wencan
[13] The farcical selection process involving a drunken boast
[14] Creation of the Special Tax Commissioner role
[15] Yang’s delusional “Three Month Plan” (October 1637)