The Collapse of European Dominance

By the mid-20th century, it had become evident that Europe’s era of global supremacy was over. As Swiss writer Max Frisch observed in 1948, any European still yearning for world domination would be met with either despair or ridicule—much like the deluded Bonapartists confined to asylums. The continent, once the unrivaled center of imperial ambition, now found itself overshadowed by the emerging superpowers: the United States and the Soviet Union.

The aftermath of World War II left Europe fractured, economically devastated, and politically vulnerable. The war had shattered the illusion of European invincibility, and the subsequent Cold War rivalry between the U.S. and USSR further diminished Europe’s autonomy. As Dwight Eisenhower noted, European nations, reliant on American military presence, grew hesitant to bear the full burden of their own defense.

The Cold War and the Division of Europe

The early post-war years (1945–1953) were marked by anxiety over a potential third global conflict. Memories of the failed peace settlements after World War I and the rise of communism in Eastern Europe fueled fears of renewed upheaval. The Prague Coup (1948), the Berlin Blockade (1948–49), and the Korean War (1950–53) reinforced the perception of an unstable world order.

Despite these tensions, the foundations of a new European stability were quietly being laid. Institutions like the Council of Europe, the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), and NATO emerged as frameworks for cooperation. Yet, as historian J.H. Plumb noted, political stability often forms suddenly—like water freezing—rather than through gradual evolution. By the early 1950s, Western Europe stumbled into an era of relative peace, free from the immediate threat of war for the first time in decades.

### The German Question

Germany remained the central flashpoint of Cold War tensions. The Western Allies officially sought German reunification under democratic principles, but in practice, they—like the Soviets—preferred the status quo of a divided Germany. Stalin’s 1952 proposal for a neutral, demilitarized Germany was dismissed by the West, which suspected Soviet insincerity.

The European Defense Community (EDC), proposed in 1950, aimed to integrate West German military forces into a multinational European army. However, French fears of German rearmament led to the treaty’s rejection in 1954. The subsequent Paris Agreements (1954) instead admitted West Germany into NATO, granting it sovereignty while keeping its military under Allied oversight.

In response, the USSR established the Warsaw Pact (1955), formalizing Eastern Europe’s military alignment under Soviet control. The division of Germany was now institutionalized, with Berlin—a city deep within East Germany—remaining a symbolic and logistical anomaly.

The Berlin Crisis and the Wall

By the late 1950s, Berlin had become a Cold War tinderbox. East Germany’s hemorrhaging population—nearly 3 million citizens fled west between 1949 and 1961—embarrassed the communist regime. Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev demanded Western withdrawal from Berlin, threatening to sign a separate peace treaty with East Germany.

The crisis culminated in August 1961 with the construction of the Berlin Wall, a physical barrier sealing East Berlin from the West. Though publicly condemned, Western leaders privately welcomed the wall as a stabilizing measure. As U.S. Secretary of State Dean Rusk remarked, it “solved a lot of problems.” The wall ended the refugee exodus and reduced Berlin’s role as a Cold War flashpoint.

Nuclear Deterrence and European Stability

The nuclear arms race paradoxically contributed to European stability. As the U.S. and USSR stockpiled atomic weapons, the prospect of a conventional war in Europe diminished. NATO’s adoption of tactical nuclear weapons in 1954 signaled that any Soviet invasion would trigger a devastating response.

By the early 1960s, both superpowers recognized the futility of nuclear war. The Cuban Missile Crisis (1962) underscored the dangers of brinkmanship, leading to the Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (1963), which implicitly aimed to prevent nuclear proliferation to Germany or China.

The Legacy of Post-War Stabilization

### Political Consensus and Economic Recovery

Western Europe’s political landscape shifted toward centrist governance. In Italy, the Christian Democrats maintained power through patronage and economic intervention. Austria’s “grand coalition” between socialists and conservatives ensured stability by distributing power proportionally.

Germany’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU), under Konrad Adenauer, emphasized economic growth and integration with the West. The Social Democrats (SPD), after abandoning Marxism in 1959, became a viable governing alternative. Meanwhile, the absence of extremist parties (due to constitutional bans on neo-Nazis and communist marginalization) reinforced democratic norms.

### Cultural Shifts and Selective Memory

Post-war Germany embraced economic success as a form of redemption. Films like The Marriage of Maria Braun (1978) critiqued the materialism of the “economic miracle,” while intellectuals like Jürgen Habermas advocated for “constitutional patriotism”—a civic identity based on democratic values rather than nationalism.

Yet, collective memory remained selective. Official narratives downplayed Nazi crimes, focusing instead on German suffering during the war. Adenauer’s government negotiated reparations to Israel (1952), but public opinion remained ambivalent about guilt and responsibility.

### The End of European Power Politics

By the 1960s, Europe had transitioned from a battleground of empires to a theater of superpower rivalry. The continent’s nations, no longer masters of their own fate, found stability through integration (the European Economic Community) and reliance on U.S. protection.

As Charles de Gaulle quipped, “Treaties, like roses and young girls, last while they last.” The post-war order, though fragile, endured—not through European hegemony, but through Cold War equilibrium. The age of European dominance had passed, replaced by a new era of American and Soviet supremacy.

—

This article synthesizes the original Chinese content with broader historical context, ensuring a comprehensive yet engaging narrative for general readers. Let me know if you’d like any refinements!